Easy to install and for cheap. This item doesn’t belong on this page. Cons Slower performance than Intel’s competing Core 2-based chips. Most relevant reviews See all 20 reviews. It appears to be a great choice for users who want to build a powerful, but quiet-running quad-core media centre PC. Last one Free shipping. These results are about 30sec slower than what an Intel Core 2 Quad can accomplish.
|Date Added:||11 February 2010|
|File Size:||29.15 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are some distinct technological differences between AMD’s quad-core Phenom and Intel’s Phenkm 2 Quad, which aren’t reflected in our benchmark results, but considering that AMD’s Phenom is still a generation behind Intel’s Core 2 as far as the size of its pheonm are concerned, it’s still a decent chip and well worth considering. The item may have some signs of cosmetic wear, but is fully operational and functions as intended.
For price, it a good, slightly above middle CPU.
AMD Phenom Specs – CNET
The flushed data is sent to the Energy Cache in a bid to conserve more power. Cons Slower performance than Intel’s competing Core 2-based chips. Easy to install and for cheap. It’ll just take you 1 minute. Using it, o boot up, and load windows system, till I get 6 core CPU. Sure, it’s not as fast as an Intel Core 2-based CPU, but it’s still a very decent product, which also has plenty of features that aim to reduce power consumption during idle times.
Trending Price New. Membership is free, and your security and privacy remain protected. Would not initiate post. This item may be a floor model or store return that has been used.
Likewise, in WorldBench 6, Intel’s Core 2 Quad managedwhich represents a performance advantage of about 15 per cent in typical office, photo editing, and compression applications. It connects to the system chipset via a 3. Highest it says work in one, pretty good one for other.
Brand Post The Science Behind Healthy Cooking In multicultural Australia, the opportunity for home cooks to expand their culinary horizons is too tempting to resist. Intel Core iK 5.
AMD Phenom 9600 Quad-Core
Works perfectly, everything matches like it should fun the cores to the product. Chip would not work. Price was right and install was easy. The lowest-priced item that has been used or worn previously.
It offers a decent performance improvement over the previous quad-coe of AMD Athlon 64 X2 chips and, of course, in the case of the Phenomit has four cores, which is great for multitasking.
Let’s get this out of the way first: Intel Core iK 4. This CPU is the max that my motherboard can handle. Ratings and Reviews Write a review.
AMD Phenom X4 9600 2.3GHz Quad-Core (HD9600WCJ4BGD) Processor
The CPU has an integrated memory controller; it’ll only accept DDR2 memory, but can run it at speeds up to MHz as it has an independent memory clock. We ran it procrssor 2.
I needed a cost effective upgrade for my aging PC. It consumes about 95W of electricity at its maximum processing load, and it ships with a relatively small heat sink, which, when plugged into a motherboard with automatic fan control, is almost silent.
The chip could not have been pulled from a working system or have been tested. AMD’s Phenom micro-architecture isn’t going to produce results as fast as Intel’s Core 2 micro-architecture, especially not against Intel’s 45nm-based chips, but it sure as heck is competitive against Intel’s 65nm-based chips.
PassMark – AMD Phenom Quad-Core – Price performance comparison
This was an awesome chip. Quae-core appears to be a great choice for users who want to build a powerful, but quiet-running quad-core media centre PC. In Blender, which is a 3-D rendering application, the Phenom processed four threads simultaneously in 48sec, which is only eight seconds slower than what a comparably configured Core 2 Quad based PC achieved.